[LAD] Re: [LAU] ReplyTo munging (Was: What hardware is actually used by freebob/ffado users?)

On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:14:44PM +0200, Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
> I strongly consider turning munging off on LAD and LAU. I know this
> might start some flames, but isn't it good free software philosophy to
> stick to the standards, especially when it comes to a recently
> reviewed RFC ?

+1

I used to like reply-to munging. But I've come to think that the risk
of accidentally posting private stuff in public greatly outweighs the
convenience of munging and the hassle of occasionally posting a
private reply by accident. And you can get convenience by using a
non-broken client.

(For example, Mutt users can add to .muttrc:

lists linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
lists linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden

... and get in the habit of using "L" to reply to the list, or just
plain old "g" to reply-all.)

-- 
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-dev