Re: [LAD] LV2 adoption

From: Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 16:35:10 EET

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:10 +0000, Krzysztof Foltman wrote:
> Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > To my mind it's better for us to develop a large suite of tools and
> > plugins to demonstrate the viability and advantages before we go
>
> I think we indeed need lots of testing tools - like debugging
> hosts/plugins spiked with lots of pre/postcondition checks, or even some
> validity checking libraries that could be easily inserted (#ifdef'ed)
> into "real" hosts/plugins, to check plugin/host behaviour in "real world".

IMO all the descriptions of restrictions in lv2.ttl that are currently
in comments should be in machine readable form for this reason. Having
that stuff in comments only is pretty silly, really.

-DR-

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jan 23 20:15:07 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 23 2008 - 20:15:08 EET