Le 29 janv. 08 à 06:11, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit :
> Stéphane Letz <letz@email-addr-hidden> writes:
>
>> Could JackEngine here be renamed "JackServer"? I think It would
>> correspond more to what "engine" and "server" are internally.
>
> Now that we are on this, please tell me what "server" and "engine" are
> internally, from your point of view. I dont care that much about
> actual
> naming as long as it is commonly accepted. For example I can recall
> some
> ppl calling jackd process the "server".
Speaking for jackdmp:
- JackEngine keep the list of clients (internal in the server and
"external/proxy" ones)
- JackServer keeps a JackEngine object, the currently used audio
driver, the "freewheel" driver... It is the "global" object in the
server process, that allocates and keeps every more internal objects.
>
>> Then why
>> not translate that in a pure C API, something like:
>
> I'll translate it once we agree on the API model (including naming).
> And
> I'll at least implement the API for the trunk jack codebase.
>
OK
Stephane
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jan 29 16:15:03 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 29 2008 - 16:15:03 EET