Re: [LAD] LS licensing (was: LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer)

From: Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jan 30 2008 - 18:11:55 EET

On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 02:24 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:18:00 -0500
> Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 21:39 +0000, pete shorthose wrote:
> > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:13:02 -0500
> > > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 19:28 +0000, pete
> > > > shorthose wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:44:46 -0500
> > > > > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 18:22 +0000, pete
> > > > > > shorthose wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:41:39 -0500
> > > > > > > Dave Robillard <dave@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > now, if you feel the need, concoct some juicy
> > > combination of pejoratives and craft them into
> > > a rejoinder. it's a free shot at the basket
> > > because i'm well and truly done talking to you.
> > > i might as well be debating an ATM.
> >
> > No, that's quite alright. You began the attacks, you may finish them.
> >
> > I'm not sure how you can possibly justify the ridiculous argument above
> > given the nature of how this sub-thread began (i.e. you attacking me).
>
> bull. you used the ad populum logical fallacy to defend your favoured interpretation
> of a contentious term. i used that same logical fallacy against you because
> it was false. obviously, as a natural consequence of refuting me, you would refute
> your earlier argument.

Um. When the point being made is literally that most people think X, ad
populum is obviously not a fallacy. Duh. You're not very good with
this whole "using latin words to sound smart" thing, maybe you should
try a new tactic?

I'll just go ahead and assume you're either trolling or an idiot (or
both) and stop reading here.

[snip two pages of bitching and putting words into my mouth]

> i'm probably as arrogant and aggressive as you but at least i try to keep it
> under wraps eh?

Not very successfully. You done yet?

-DR-

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jan 30 20:15:16 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 20:15:16 EET