Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3

From: Bob Ham <rah@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Feb 04 2008 - 23:37:13 EET

On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 18:18 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > I fail the see the advantage of D-Bus over e.g. OSC via UDP or TCP.

> The core issue is abstracting the interfaces involved. As long as it
> serves to free LASH from being a libjack client

Why is freeing LASH from being a libjack client a goal?

Bob

-- 
Bob Ham <rah@email-addr-hidden>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Tue Feb 5 00:15:03 2008

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Davis: "Re: [LAD] [Fwd: Re: Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3]"
Previous message: Juuso Alasuutari: "[LAD] [Fwd: Re: Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3]"
In reply to: Juuso Alasuutari: "Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3"
Next in thread: Fons Adriaensen: "Re: [LAD] Summercode 2008: LASH, pt. 3"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 05 2008 - 00:15:04 EET