On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:23 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
> I'm assuming you meant to post this to the list, Paul.
>
> In reply to your comment:
>
> One of the motives behind jack-dbus is that a JACK control application
> shouldn't have to be RT capable since it's not processing any
> realtime-sensitive data anyway. From a technical perspective, could
> libjack be extended with such a non realtime control API?
there are many parts of the JACK API that are not RT-bound. in fact,
basically *all* of it except for a clients process() callback, which a
client is not required to register.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Feb 5 04:15:01 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 05 2008 - 04:15:01 EET