Re: [LAD] Let's kill EPAMP???

From: Stefano D'Angelo <zanga.mail@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 02 2008 - 23:59:21 EEST

2008/6/2 Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>:
> Am Montag, 2. Juni 2008 schrieb Wolfgang Woehl:
>> Arnold Krille:
>> > And why is time-stretching limited to non-realtime audio?
>> Aaannnddd wwwhhhyyy iiisss tttiiimmmeee---ssstttrrrettch <meep>
>> sorry, time's up.
>
> Well, try syncing two devices that don't share a world-clock and you
> will "fix" that problem with real-time-time-stretching. So yes, there is a
> rather practical use (but I actually don't advise to syncing two devices
> without a common-clock) for real-time audio stretching (its also called a
> dither-buffer but why use these algorithms when there is rubberband and co?).

I guess you mean resampling, otherwise I don't think it's phisically
possible to go ahead or behind in time.

I'm not interest in resampling plugins, but maybe someone else is?

Stefano
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Tue Jun 3 00:15:10 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 03 2008 - 00:15:11 EEST