On Thursday 06 August 2009 10:16:34 you wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Raymond Martin<laseray@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Nonetheless, any
> > code mixed with GPL code and distributed automatically becomes GPL
> > regardless of any other distribution of the same code under another
> > license.
>
> This is quite wrong and, frankly, far more scarily so than mere
> misunderstandings about what is actually in the GPL. The fact that
> you persist in it despite having had it explained to you several times
> shows a serious and potentially dangerous misconception about
> copyright, not just about the details of a particular license. I very
> much hope there are not many more people out there who share this
> misconception.
That's funny because it is exactly what I think about your refusal to
understand what is written in plain language in the GPL itself.
Show me where you get your ideas. I can show you that mine come
from the writing of the license.
Plus, you definitely have taken one sentence and singled it out here.
That is called cherry picking, taking an idea out of context to suit
your own purposes.
Thus it is people like you who continue to deny the actual language
of the license that make it a constant chore to explain it repeatedly.
Raymond
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Aug 6 20:15:09 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 06 2009 - 20:15:09 EEST