On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 15:37 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> Looking at this, people say, "This is good, but it's kind of a mess at the
> moment. Can we get some sort of 'canonical list of extensions' or
> /something/ stable for devs to work from?" To which Dave replies, "FUD!
> FUD! FUD! Such a list accomplishes nothing!"
Actually I specifically said making a list of "well supported"
extensions was a good idea.
Making a bunch of different "categories" of LV2 support is stupid, and
claiming the extension thing is some apocalyptic disaster with no
evidence is FUD.
> Dave *seems* to think that "The
> Problem" isn't a problem.
Dave is, at this moment, working on "The Problem" (documentation).
Actions speak louder than words.
-dr
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Nov 8 20:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 08 2009 - 20:15:03 EET