Re: [LAD] LADI

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:

>> 1) The 'one app with plugins' group. People who are focusing on one big
>> app, extended by plugins (Ardour, Qtractor, LV2/DSSI). This group
>> doesn't have much interest in a session handler.
>
> And quite probably the authors of these apps are not very
> motivated to make them compatible with session handlers.

Over the past few months I've decided that I'm in group #1.
Session management is good... but it requires /some/ level
of consensus. I think LAD (at present) is too hostile to
achieve this without some sort of "politician" showing up to
unify the devs (and it ain't me, babe).

That said, I'm open to adding session management to my
applications and would love it if session management could
succeed.

> 4. And there's group 4, or maybe that group is just me.
> If there are others I'd like to know. For group 4:

When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4.
Inter-host and headless session management is important to
me, too.

I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-)

-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Dec 20 08:15:02 2009