Re: [LAD] LADI

On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 11:23:54AM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
> Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
> > When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4.
> > Inter-host and headless session management is important to
> > me, too.
> >
> > I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-)
>
> @Fons, thanks for your reply. It seems that you're not planned to make a
> session handler for the mass... That's not bad at all in many cases.
> Good luck with it and I hope you decide to release your code.
>
> Ok, roughly we have 4 groups now (assuming that we can call >1
> individuals a group ;) )
>
> Group 1 has spoken, group 3 and group 4.
>
> What can we expect from group 2? Maybe some of the lash developers
> belongs in this group?
> Dave, Juuso, Bob Ham, ... ? What are your plans now?

dunno... jack session is frozen now.
it took a huge flame war to find out some implications of the
requirements.

so basically i dont think we can reach consensus.
and sessionhandling is _only_ about consensus. its not a problem at all
to implement.

lad is dead.

>
>
> Regards,
>
> \r
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

-- 
torben Hohn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev