Bob Ham wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 13:32 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-01-03 at 12:27 +0000, Bob Ham wrote:
>>
>>> This "product", Mixbus, does indeed seem to be a modified version of
>>> Ardour. However, I can't seem to find any source code or, for that
>>> matter any downloads at all on the Harrison website.
>> http://ardour.org/node/3011
>>
>
> It's good to see that the source code is publicly available
not completely. the ardour and channel strip UI part is, but the actual
dsp guts are in a closed-source ladspa plugin written by harrison.
> but I'm
> still concerned that Harrison customers might not be told that they have
> access to it. I could find no mention whatsoever of source code on
> their website. According to the GPL 2, they must necessarily provide
> along with their binaries, either the source code itself or a written
> offer to provide the source code. Is this happening?
interesting question. i'm sure ben loftis can clarify. in any case,
there is certainly no ill will involved here.
i can see how harrison, given their prospective customer base, would not
want to talk about anything as scary source code on their product page... ;)
for them, the most elegant way would probably be a link in some README
in the download package.
happy new year, everyone!
jörn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Jan 3 20:15:01 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 03 2010 - 20:15:01 EET