> i wrote tschack because i wanted to try out a different approach to the
> functionality in jack2. and to understand how a parallel jack works.
> now some people who had bad experience with jack2 tried it, and it works
> for them.
> so there is no reason to hide tschack.
On this specific point, what makes more sense : try to understand and fix the problems for "some people who had bad experience with jack2" ? or wait for a C++ rewritten jack1 ???
Stéphane
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Apr 19 16:15:03 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 19 2010 - 16:15:03 EEST