On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
> "you can swap qtractor for ardour, or anything else for that matter and the
> latency will be exactly the same systematic. a client can only process the
> results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_ process cycle."
>
> Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed.
>
> I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the recording
> took place.
Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the offset
that results) for precisely this purpose.
--p
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Apr 29 20:15:07 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 29 2010 - 20:15:07 EEST