On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona@email-addr-hiddenwrote:
>
>> "you can swap qtractor for ardour, or anything else for that matter and
>> the
>> latency will be exactly the same systematic. a client can only process the
>> results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_ process cycle."
>>
>> Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed.
>>
>> I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the
>> recording took place.
>
>
> Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the offset
> that results) for precisely this purpose.
>
> --p
>
>
This is exactly how I thought it can be done! Great Paul, really nice job
you did!
I think Rui is planning to implement something of that sort as well.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Thu Apr 29 20:15:07 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 29 2010 - 20:15:07 EEST