On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:36:43 +0400, Louigi Verona wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona wrote:
>>
>>> "you can swap qtractor for ardour, or anything else for that matter
and
>>> the latency will be exactly the same systematic. a client can only
process
>>> the results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_ process cycle."
>>>
>>> Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed.
>>>
>>> I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the
>>> recording took place.
>>
>>
>> Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the
>> offset that results) for precisely this purpose.
>>
>
> This is exactly how I thought it can be done! Great Paul, really nice
job
> you did!
>
> I think Rui is planning to implement something of that sort as well.
do i? :)
anyway, while on the clip properties dialog you can always alter the clip
start-time manually, in frames
cheers
-- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@email-addr-hidden _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Thu Apr 29 20:15:08 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 29 2010 - 20:15:08 EEST