Re: [LAD] Looking for an introduction to rt programming with a gui

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 9:41 AM, torbenh <torbenh@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> but i find the equivalen c++ easier to read.
> assuming we have a proper modern c++ osc lib:
>
> boost::unique_future<OscMsg>
> osc_recv (OscPeer peer, std::string path)
> {
>        boost::shared_ptr< boost::promise<OscMsg> > spromise( new boost::promise<OscMsg> )
>        peer.add_handler( path, [=]( OscMsg msg )
>        {
> [...]

Is this C++0xthingy?

I have to say this combination of Boost plus Weird Stuff From The
Future is no more readable to me (as a long-time C++ programmer) than
the Clojure example. It looks neat, but I'm pretty sure it's
accessible to you only because it's what you've spent the time with
recently.

I worry about that all the time with my own code -- the more care I
take to use the language well, the less likely anyone else is to be
able to work with it.

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon May 24 00:15:01 2010