On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:54:35PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> I could record audio for kick, snare, hi hat and bass one after the
> other and mix it to one rhythm group and additionally I could record all
> instruments at the same time and send the recordings to you and you
> could do the same by yourself.
That is not a valid test. If the soft instrument that generates
these sounds aligns MIDI events to Jack periods, and you are using
a period size of 1024 as you say you are, it proves nothing at all.
Apart from that, it remains to be seen if *real* timing errors of
+/- 2 ms do 'destroy the groove'. To test this, make the same
recording
- without jitter,
- with 1 ms jitter,
- with 2 ms jitter,
- with 3 ms jitter.
and check if listeners are able to identify which is which,
or at least to put them into order.
What you have been doing so far is compare an 'exact' version
with one that has some unkown and uncontrolled errors. You could
'prove' anything you want in that way.
You are just jumping to conclusions and making gratituous
generalisations.
Ciao,
-- Je veux que la mort me trouve plantant mes choux, mais nonchalant d’elle, et encore plus de mon jardin imparfait. (Michel de Montaigne) _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Fri Jul 16 20:15:12 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jul 16 2010 - 20:15:12 EEST