On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
> Oh sorry, I checked it out but the workflow/interface made me think it's
> not for a performance act.
> And I always felt that tX's workflow and Gui, its support for multiple
> turntables suits my needs.
> Neverless looking at the mixxx website, mixx has evolved since the last
> time i checked it out.
> I'll play with it, until I've made tX what I want it to be.
> By the way the scratch algorithm in tX is superior to any other program
> (even mixxx) I've played with.
Well, FWIW, Mixxx is under very active development.
They're responsive to code contributions, too. I think
I've heard talk that there's guys work on support for
more decks, also. (Maybe even more turntables?)
Anyway, that also would be a good team to join forces with.
:-)
-gabriel
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Apr 1 20:15:02 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2011 - 20:15:03 EEST