Re: [LAD] Audio problem for numerical optimization

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Mar 02 2014 - 15:25:09 EET

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Tim Goetze <tim@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Two algorithms of wide and likely lasting use that might be able to
> benefit strongly from vectorisation come to my mind: sample-rate
> conversion and time-stretching (the frequency-domain kind which
> already benefits from FFTW efficiency but does a lot of costly
> arithmetic on top of that). There's excellent code for both out there
> but I think -- correct me if I'm wrong -- it's pretty much exclusively
> scalar not vector/parallel processing.
>

i totally concur.

the OP(s) should by looking at both soundtouch and librubberband. any
others?

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Mar 2 16:15:04 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 02 2014 - 16:15:04 EET