Re: [LAD] [LAU] zitaretuner

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:08:10PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:

> You can partly blame me, I initially packaged this plugin for KXStudio
> which made it more accessible for users. I should have a) checked the
> source better and b) tested the resulting binary better as it doesn't
> remotely do the job the way Zita-AT1 does. Partial comfort might be that
> others probably recognized the flaws too and the package didn't survive
> time. I'll see what I can do to have the remaining packages and source
> code removed.

OK, thanks.

What remains (and I don't blame you for that), is a bunch of users
believing that zita-*** is crap. Even if someone some day writes a
perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother
to try it.

> As for the violation of the license, don't give in to the Jeff Glatt's
> of this world.

I won't. Judging from hist posts on LM he must be a complete idiot.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev