Re: [LAD] [LAU] zitaretuner

"Even if someone some day writes a
perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother
to try it."

Not necessarily true.

On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 08:08:10PM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>
> > You can partly blame me, I initially packaged this plugin for KXStudio
> > which made it more accessible for users. I should have a) checked the
> > source better and b) tested the resulting binary better as it doesn't
> > remotely do the job the way Zita-AT1 does. Partial comfort might be that
> > others probably recognized the flaws too and the package didn't survive
> > time. I'll see what I can do to have the remaining packages and source
> > code removed.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> What remains (and I don't blame you for that), is a bunch of users
> believing that zita-*** is crap. Even if someone some day writes a
> perfectly working version lv2 version of at1 they won't even bother
> to try it.
>
> > As for the violation of the license, don't give in to the Jeff Glatt's
> > of this world.
>
> I won't. Judging from hist posts on LM he must be a complete idiot.
>
> Ciao,
>
> --
> FA
>
> A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
> It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
> and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-dev mailing list
> Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
>

-- 
Louigi Verona
http://www.louigiverona.ru/

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sun Oct 12 00:15:03 2014