Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] A couple of points on the state of linux a udio apps
From: Joachim Backhaus (jbackhaus_AT_pironet-ndh.com)
Date: Tue Feb 26 2002 - 11:28:47 EET
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stéphane Rollandin [mailto:hepta_AT_infonie.fr]
> Sent: Dienstag, 26. Februar 2002 07:00
> To: linux-audio-user_AT_music.columbia.edu
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] A couple of points on the
> state of linux
> audio apps
>
>
> hello,
>
> a few ideas about ratings:
>
>
> I think a form for optional comments is critical.
>
> Commented ratings could be considered as more important
> (weighted) than
> uncommented ones.
>
> Ratings older than 2 (or 1 ?) years could be just forgotten
> altogether.
Another problem is: What version of the software is rated?
E.g. someone dislikes V 1.0 of an app and but likes
V 2.0. How would you handle this?
Ratings for versions?
But what is with software that changes versions every week, or so???
Regards,
Joachim Backhaus
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Feb 26 2002 - 11:18:40 EET