Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] is ext3 ok for real-time / low-latency?
From: Taybin Rutkin (trutkin_AT_physics.clarku.edu)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 22:01:54 EET
On 15 Feb 2003, Jan "Evil Twin" Depner wrote:
> I actually think XFS would be a good solution, however, as Mark Knecht
> said, it doesn't come with kernel I'm using. It may also not be as
> stable as reiserfs, I just don't know. Reiserfs works well for me so
> I'll wait until XFS has been beaten on for a while.
What makes XFS look interesting (to me) is that is has this undocumented,
non-supported feature call "realtime" mentioned in the documentation for
it. The only info given is "not ready yet". Makes it look appealing
though.
Taybin
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Feb 16 2003 - 22:04:50 EET