Re: [linux-audio-user] is ext3 ok for real-time / low-latency?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] is ext3 ok for real-time / low-latency?
From: Jan \ (eviltwin69_AT_cableone.net)
Date: Sun Feb 16 2003 - 02:46:49 EET


I actually think XFS would be a good solution, however, as Mark Knecht
said, it doesn't come with kernel I'm using. It may also not be as
stable as reiserfs, I just don't know. Reiserfs works well for me so
I'll wait until XFS has been beaten on for a while.

Jan

  On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 18:30, Rick Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 17:00, anton wrote:
> > On Saturday 15 February 2003 22:40, Jan \ wrote:
>
> > > I only use reiserfs on my data drive. I use ext3 on my root drive. If
> > > you're doing any serious recording you need a dedicated data drive. I
> > > *really* wouldn't use reiserfs on the root drive.
> > >
> > Hm, Now I dont, I learned the hard way as usual...
>
> XFS? Seeing as it's made for AV stuff {I think}... I'd think it would
> be appropriate. I had an old 10 gig formatted with it... it seemed a bit
> slow. ... Then again, it's a old 10 gig.
>
> --
> Rick Taylor <ricktaylor_AT_speakeasy.net>
> The Dispossessed
>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Feb 16 2003 - 02:53:26 EET