Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: producing a drum sample library for hydrogen

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: producing a drum sample library for hydrogen
From: Lee Revell (rlrevell_AT_joe-job.com)
Date: Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:06:22 EEST


On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 22:55, RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net wrote:
> On 19-Jun-2004 Vescovi Christophe wrote:
> } RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net a crit :
>
> } > :} I *need* those sounds.
>
> } Sorry but this is a bad example .....
> } This example has nothing to do with the sample rate of the sample
> } (sound) but with the method used to implement a digital delay effect.
> } In the case you are exposing you will certainly have the same effect
> } with a initial 24/48 sample rate up-sampled to 96 just to process the
> } effect. This method was used by Steinberg in one of their VST EQ plugin
> } in order to improved the response of the EQ in high frequency.
> } You don't need 24/96 to have those sound, you need better digital effect
> } processors !!!
>
> It's a perfectly good example... It's indicative of the results that I get
> overall. With 24/96 I get what I want... regardless of the reasons behind
> it. Why would I use anything else? Because someone else tells me I should?
>

I never meant to say anyone should use anything other than what gives
them the best sound. I should have been more specific, my point was
that I think 96khz is overkill for recording sounds from outside the
computer. Of course you should upsample and process at a higher
resolution if possible, no matter what format your input is, just
because it gives you more room for error.

Lee


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Jun 20 2004 - 07:02:25 EEST