Subject: RE: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
From: Polashek, Matthew (Matthew.Polashek_AT_scottforesman.com)
Date: Thu Jul 08 2004 - 21:48:48 EEST
It's the reason I keep a Mac around the house. Oh that and Pro Tools. When
is Ardour going to be interoperable with Pro Tools again?......
Matthew
> ----------
> From: RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net
> Reply To: RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net;A list for linux audio users
> Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2004 2:27 PM
> To: A list for linux audio users
> Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
>
> On 08-Jul-2004 Them wrote:
>
> } Don't count on it happening. And you don't need it on Linux anyway.
> }
> } I think Rosegarden or NoteEdit are good contenders, and don't cost you
> } $500.00. And Rosegarden works with JACK and LADSPA plugins, whereas
> } Finale does not. And Finale can't do LilyPond. Finale's PostScript
> } output option is a piece of junk, IMHO.
>
> It is sort of universally recognized as the best. IEEHO
>
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: RickTaylor_AT_Speakeasy.Net
> Date: 08-Jul-2004
> Time: 13:24:09
>
> This message was sent by XFMail
> ----------------------------------
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
This email may contain confidential material.
If you were not an intended recipient,
please notify the sender and delete all copies.
We may monitor email to and from our network.
****************************************************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jul 08 2004 - 21:56:42 EEST