Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Finale for Linux
From: Them (idragosani_AT_chapelperilous.net)
Date: Thu Jul 08 2004 - 21:50:06 EEST
RickTaylor_AT_speakeasy.net wrote:
> } I think Rosegarden or NoteEdit are good contenders, and don't cost you
> } $500.00. And Rosegarden works with JACK and LADSPA plugins, whereas
> } Finale does not. And Finale can't do LilyPond. Finale's PostScript
> } output option is a piece of junk, IMHO.
>
> It is sort of universally recognized as the best. IEEHO
It is pretty nice software, don't get me wrong, but it's not perfect,
and it's very expensive. It's MIDI import screws stuff up a lot, and
I've had problems writing drum tracks. There was this one MIDI version
of a Dream Theater song I was using so I could learn the tune for a band
I was in, and Finale didn't play it back correctly (there were some
wierd triplets). The exact same MIDI file imported into Rosegarden 4
played back with the correct rhythm.
--
Rule of Feline Frustration:
When your cat has fallen asleep on your lap and looks utterly
content and adorable, you will suddenly have to go to the
bathroom.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jul 08 2004 - 21:57:32 EEST