Mark Constable <markc@email-addr-hidden> writes:
> Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > ...
> > Many kernel developers opposed this. It *is* something of a hack.
> > But, no one has been able to come up with a better solution, and this
> > one at least looks safe. I expect it to be replaced by something
> > better in the 2.8 timeframe.
>
> Whoa... like in two or more years from now :-(
That's why I am patiently working to get realtime-lsm merged soon.
> Is there any extra reasonable lobbying the rest of us
> could do ?
Looks like things are going OK right now. No need to rock the boat
unless something comes unglued again.
> I tried the patches but my system fell over, probably
> for other reasons (nvidia etc). I hope to try again rsn.
>
> FWIW the -mm2 patch would not apply over a Gentoo patched
> kernel but a "normal" kernel, 2.6.10 + rc3 + mm2, would
> not load the nvidia-kernel (amd64) Gentoo ebuilt module.
Sorry to hear that. Thanks for trying.
-- joqReceived on Mon Feb 14 04:15:21 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 14 2005 - 04:15:21 EET