Re: [linux-audio-user] question for Delta 1010 users

From: Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com>
Date: Fri Mar 18 2005 - 21:53:40 EET

On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:40 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 19:43 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I got my 1010 replacement today. Meanwhile, i was using a SoundBlaster
> Live Value, i just couldn't stand the onboard AC97 sound output.
> I pulled the SBLive out now and replaced it with the new Delta 1010.
>
> Shock! Horror! I used to think that SoundBlaster are decent cards -
> well, now, after getting used to the SB sound and migrating to 1010...
> there's a clear difference!

Not suprised, but to be completely fair the SBLive Value does have the
cheapest codecs and worst S/N ratio of all of them. So that's not an
entirely fair comparison. It is a $30 sound card after all.

Also did you use the rear channels as your mains? It's fairly well
documented that the ADC used for the rear channels on sblive cards is
much better quality.

Lee
Received on Sat Mar 19 00:15:07 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 19 2005 - 00:15:07 EET