Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 19:07 +0200, Christoph Eckert wrote:
>
>>>CONCLUSION : most of my difficulties have happened from the
>>>removal of alsaconf of the package alsa-utils, I don't
>>>understand why someone has decided to do this removal.
>>
>>Worth a bug report?
>
>
> Not if you're using ALSA 1.0.6, that's way too old. If you have the
> same issue with 1.0.9b, then it's worth a bug report.
>
> Lee
I am using ALSA 1.0.6 the last package alsa-utils found in
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/3/SRPMS/
And in this package alsaconf is missing.
Ii's not a way too old for a user (not a developer).
I have verified that on the ALSA site that alsaconf that the package
alsa-utils-1.0.9rc4a contains alsconf.
But it seems to me a good idea to send a bug report with the solution of
the bug : update the package alsa-utils-1.0.6-3.src.rpm.
-- Michel Levy L.S.R., Bureau C214, B.P.72 - 38402 SAINT MARTIN D'HERES CEDEX e.mail : Michel.Levy@email-addr-hidden tel :(33)476514022 http://www-lsr.imag.fr/users/Michel.LevyReceived on Thu Jul 7 16:19:39 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 07 2005 - 16:19:40 EEST