On 2/12/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 22:41 -0500, Will Dyson wrote:
> > I honestly have no idea why all the distros are dragging their feet on
> > this.
>
> Probably because few users have bothered to ask them to fix it. The
> Ubuntu developers were glad to support this, but other than that old
> Debian bug report, no one else had asked them for this feature.
Are you saying that the Ubuntu devs were aware of the Debian bug, but
not the one in Malone? Or just that they don't take bug reports in
their own system seriously?
Heh.
> Does anyone know the status of this in FC5?
Or Suse 10.1?
For what it's worth, I just filed a wishlist bug againt debian's
libc6-dev, asking for a backport of the patch that defines RLIMIT_NICE
and RLIMIT_RTPRIO in <bits/resource.h>. Perhaps if that happens, the
pam maintainers will feel less sketchy about backporting the pam
patch.
-- Will DysonReceived on Mon Feb 13 12:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:15:05 EET