Hallo,
Lee Revell hat gesagt: // Lee Revell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:45 -0800, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
> > That is rediculous. Do you really have to start program that way
> > to get realtime priority? In case, I guess (and _really_ hope)
> > that realtime-lsm (or something similar) will continue to exist for a
> > long time still.
>
> Yes, absolutely, it is ridiculous.
As ridiculous as having to start another program before being able to
get audio in and out of Ardour? ;)
> In the upcoming Ubuntu Dapper release this will Just Work. No patching
> the kernel or PAM or cryptic CLI utilities.
As I wrote, PAM is another solution and it's the one to prefer in the
long run, but it's the harder one to get right now, *if* your
distribution doesn't have patched packages. (Does Slackware still ship
without PAM?) The set_rtlimits approach is dead simple compared to
that. It even is dead simple compared to realtime-LSM, if someone
doesn't want to mess with kernel-modules, because it is completely in
userspace.
But of course if someone already has the LSM set up and has
no problems with it, (s)he should continue to use it. Deprecated
doesn't mean disfunctional.
Ciao
-- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__Received on Mon Feb 13 12:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 13 2006 - 12:15:06 EET