Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Digital Fidelity

From: Joe Hartley <jh@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Mar 02 2006 - 17:12:41 EET

On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:19:53 -0500
Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> > > the reason their stuff is so good is not directly related to the
> > > converters themselves, but to the sample clock that drives them.
> >
> > Paul, what's your opinion on the Delta 1010's word clock?
>
> no opinion. lets just aim for the specs: what's the jitter?

Excellent question, and one that seems to be fairly hard to answer, as
none of the 1010 literature I have gives specs for this, and it's not
something easily found by Googling, either.

That in itself makes me go hmmmm.

-- 
======================================================================
       Joe Hartley - UNIX/network Consultant - jh@email-addr-hidden
Without deviation from the norm, "progress" is not possible. - FZappa
Received on Thu Mar 2 20:15:06 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 02 2006 - 20:15:06 EET