On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 10:12 -0500, Joe Hartley wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:19:53 -0500
> Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > > > the reason their stuff is so good is not directly related to the
> > > > converters themselves, but to the sample clock that drives them.
> > >
> > > Paul, what's your opinion on the Delta 1010's word clock?
> >
> > no opinion. lets just aim for the specs: what's the jitter?
>
> Excellent question, and one that seems to be fairly hard to answer, as
> none of the 1010 literature I have gives specs for this, and it's not
> something easily found by Googling, either.
>
> That in itself makes me go hmmmm.
there is another possibility: that i've been duped by a highly tech-
oriented sales pitch and that in reality jitter doesn't matter much.
Received on Thu Mar 2 20:15:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 02 2006 - 20:15:06 EET