--- Stephen Cameron <smcameron@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> --- R Parker <rtp405@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
> It's really a very nice, convenient machine for
> tracking.
Until you want to record and monitor 8+ tracks. And
then it's infuriating.
Not so good for editing, and there's no
> nice
> way to get things into or out of it. Mostly
> what little music I do is internet collaborations,
> so I end up with a process like this:
>
> download/decode tracks (mp3 ->wav), burn cds,
> import tracks to AW, record my parts, burn cds,
> import tracks to pc, encode/upload. Rather tedious.
I think you can redesign for a much better studio. Is
your PC hardware capable of running jackd without
xruns?
> Would be nice to transform that process to:
>
> download/decode tracks, transfer to AW over ADAT
> cables, record my parts, transfer to PC over ADAT
> cables, encode/upload tracks.
Don't use the HDR but use the mixer and monitoring
interfaces with i/o routed to the RME card all the
time. Record to the AW HDR at a remote locations;
practice space, bar, etc.
I'm looking at your setup while occupied with
something else. Am I overlooking your reasons for
recording to the AW?
Ron
> That's where I'm trying to get to.
>
> -- steve
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Tue Jun 20 20:15:03 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 20 2006 - 20:15:04 EEST