> I have an archive of the previous LinuxSampler discussions. It's
> a few dozen messages. I challenge you to provide the message
> ID's of any messages in those threads discussing the two
> specific issues I brought up.
>
> You can't, because everyone was too busy going, "Hey, they're
> violating the GPL" or "No, they're not" or "Hmm, I wonder if
> Tascam is behind this" to wonder if Linuxsampler is violating
> the OSI trademark or the FSF's copyright on the text of the GPL.
>
And the spirit of the discussion is the same, are they violating the
semantical issues of these things, or is does their intent make up for that.
Personally I don't care worth a lick for semantics, and I consider the
fact that people do argue over this useless.
I also think the fact that anyone has trademarked Open Source
ridiculous. That is a sign that our society has gotten much to uptight
about many things.
Seablade
Received on Fri Aug 25 04:15:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 25 2006 - 04:15:10 EEST