Re: [LAU] Foul Language

From: Dave Robillard <drobilla@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Apr 10 2007 - 03:48:55 EEST

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:52 +0100, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:36 +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > Is it really necessary? Can we say the same thing in a nicer manner?
> > Maybe a hundred posts one after another: That must suck, et al. I think folks
> > of our intelligence and talent can do better.
>
> Since when is "suck" classed as "foul language"?

Heh, no kidding... this thread is just hilarious. All this over
"sucks"!
 
Wow, guys. Just.... wow.

-DR-

P.S. This thread sucks

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Apr 10 04:15:05 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 10 2007 - 04:15:06 EEST