Re: [LAU] [ANN] JAD 1.0 officially released

Dave Phillips wrote:
> tim hall wrote:
>
>> ... you would be better off comparing JAD to the 32bit version of 64
>> Studio.
>
> Yes, but the publisher wants me to profile a 64-bit audio system, and
> AFAICT 64 Studio is the only one in something like full bloom.

Fair enough. I'm running the 32bit version if you do need to compare notes.

>> However, I have a rough idea of what your partitioning schemes already
>> look like and I don't blame you for not installing both. ;)
>
> My partitioning scheme is a dividing wall. The JAD box is one room, the
> 64 Studio iron is in another. It's a necessary scheme, they attack one
> another ferociously if kept in the same space.

Aw, I'm sure they're just play-fighting. ;)

So long as I give my 64Studio box plenty of exercise and keep it away
from 'artificial additives' it usually behaves itself.

cheers,

tim
/|\
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 17 20:15:03 2007