Re: [LAU] difference between realtime-kernel and low-latency-kernel?

i'm not able to access that pc at the moment, but i will when i get a
chance.

thanks
porl

On 14/10/2007, Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 14 October 2007, porl sheean wrote:
> > i have actually had no end of trouble with ubuntustudio's (and now
> > ubuntu's) rt kernel. on an amd 6000+ system with 1gig ram and a rme9652
> > soundcard i can't get reliable performance under 40 or so ms. i even
> tried
> > a vanilla kernel with the rt patches and had the same trouble. the
> 64studio
> > kernel worked fine, however. i'm currently running at 5ms with it and
> have
> > had no problems. this is even with compiz fusion running and spinning
> the
> > cube whilst playing back audio from an 18 channel ardour project. what
> > patches would cause such a difference in performance? it isn't any
> options
> > selected in 'make menuconfig' - i loaded the 64studio's ones in and used
> > them. still no luck. i can only assume they have added more patches to
> do
> > with realtime performance than just the -rt patchset. any ideas?
>
> Hi,
>
> let us see the output of this script on your ubuntu RT box with jackd
> running:
>
> http://tapas.affenbande.org/rt-setup-report.sh
>
> Thanks,
> Flo
>
> --
> Palimm Palimm!
> http://tapas.affenbande.org
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Oct 15 20:15:02 2007