On Nov 20, 2007 6:52 PM, Thomas Kuther <gimpel@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Di, 20.11.07 14:42 "Susanne Schneider" <susemuse27@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > hi everybody,
> > as an experiment on this item I compiled a kernel with modified
> > config: I removed acpi completely and additionally deactivated the
> > option "enable tickless..." (or so..). Then I booted the kernel with
> > standard options. Result: Ardour behaves as it should, everything
> > works just fine, system audio performance at it's best! Obviously
> > there is a diffenrence between booting an acpi-enabled kernel with
> > option "acpi=off" and a kernel built without acpi capabilities. Maybe
> > somebody has an explanation - I don't... thanks for attention anyway
> > Su
>
Hey there.
Just to share experience :
2.6.23.1-rt11 #25 PREEMPT RT Sun Nov 18 14:01:45 CET 2007 i686
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
Dyn_ticks enabled
ACPI enabled
ACPI cpufreq with conservative governor
HDSP multiface (with the pcmcia cardbus)
jack latency @ 2.66 ms
ardour 2.1
No xruns (exept with a few problematic clients like xmms2 or mplayer)
no trouble with Ardour
sudo cat /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
hpet
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
MarcO'Chapeau.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Nov 21 00:15:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Nov 21 2007 - 00:15:02 EET