Re: [LAU] motu 828 mkii latency

From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Feb 13 2008 - 12:51:04 EET

Roman Muņoz Roncal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you, I'm using -rt kernels, of course. Now I know that 8ms is
> probably ffado's limitation... so I can return the card to my friend and
> say him about testing it under bigger loads.
That's a good idea.

>
> He says that 8ms is better than that he's getting with the same card
> with vista. somewhat about 20 ms if I recall it correctly
I'm pretty confident that we are competitive with the other OS'es.

We should be able to achieve even lower latencies in the future, but
currently that's not a priority.

Greets,

Pieter

>
> Best regards,
> Roman
>
> Pieter Palmers wrote:
>>
>> Use realtime priority and a RT patched kernel.
>>
>> Note that FFADO isn't supposed to work at very low latencies at the
>> moment. I'd say 3x128 (=8ms) is about the limit of the current
>> version. Will be better on the long run, but at the moment that's it.
>>
>> Greets,
>>
>> Pieter
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 13 16:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 13 2008 - 16:15:03 EET