Re: [LAU] Decent and attractive audio player

Kaffeine works for me. I hate Noatun. I find mplayer nice for command
line use. I don't care much about media player's organization abilities,
I'm find with Konqueror's file management capabilities.

Loki Davison wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well, name says it all, what do people like for an audio player?
> I read this blog post and was wondering if there is something he
> missed as i have somewhat similar experiences,
>
> http://blog.brokenfunction.com/2008/04/26/why-arent-there-any-good-linux-media-players/
>
> I've been using audacious and amarok and both seem to have there
> problems. Amarok makes me think too much about searching and freaks
> out parsing a lot of my collection and seem really, really stupid in a
> few ways. Also i don't like it how it can't just play from the
> collection, i.e when it finishes that album, just go onto the next,
> etc. Audacious is ok in a no organisation at all way. I like all my
> music to be easy to search and there is 200gb of it.
>
> Aqualung seems technically just what i want, but the interface is not
> my taste. I find it really ugly and a bit unfriendly.
>
> So what are the options?

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user