Re: [LAU] First commercial VSTi for Linux released

From: Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Sep 06 2008 - 15:58:26 EEST

On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 12:54:59PM +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:

> For the record: AFAIK DBUS is perfectly capable of networked operation.

I've found no reference to that in the DBUS docs. And the interface,
being designed to allow all sorts of bindings, is horribly bloated.

Does LASH use DBUS in a network-aware way ? Can it launch an app on
a remote machine ?

> And even if it's not, there is no reason why a simple OSC<->lash bridge
> could not be built. IMHO that definitely beats writing a custom session
> manager.

The *last* thing I want is to have layer upon layer of protocols
and abstractions. And XML.

Once the apps have the OSC fucntionality build-in (and they need that
anyway), they can talk network wide to each other and to a session
manager, it just needs definition of the protocol. No need to add
anything else.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Sep 6 16:15:01 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Sep 06 2008 - 16:15:01 EEST