Am Montag 15 September 2008 schrieb Darren Landrum:
> Florian Schmidt wrote:
> > Well basically you tell the configure script to add a string "no" to every
> > build line.. Then of course g++ tries to compile a file called "no". Which is
> > probably not what you want..
>
> So why did it work before? Some kind of environment difference?
>
> If I want to tell configure not to compile any of the Vamp stuff, how
> would I do it?
>
> I ask not just because I want to avoid Vamp for now, but because my last
> experience with compiling Vamp went very, very poorly. It was all
> documented on this list.
>
> Someway, somehow, I was once able to tell Rubber Band not to compile its
> Vamp plug-in examples.
Are you really sure you used "no" as argument for these variables? they come
from pkgconfig usually and contain paths and/or options, or are empty if the
package in question isn't installed. Try
./configure Vamp_CFLAGS= Vamp_LIBS=
This seems to have the desired effect here, although Vamp is installed and
detected by ./configure, the g++ lines look like this later:
g++ -DHAVE_FFTW3 -DFFTW_DOUBLE_ONLY -DNO_THREAD_CHECKS -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -Irubberband -Isrc -c -o src/AudioCurve.o src/AudioCurve.cpp
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> Regards,
> Darren Landrum
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
Edgar
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Sep 16 00:15:04 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 16 2008 - 00:15:04 EEST