I think it depends on what kind of audio work you are facing to.
5.3 ms latency is not good if you do monitoring from software, so for
non-prof use almost everyone can live with 5.3ms latency.
But recording a vocal track could be a little drama, because latencies > 5ms
are really audible and from the headphones/monitor it sounds like singing
within an empty barrel of oil.
cheers
r
2009/1/27 Peder Hedlund <peder@email-addr-hidden>
> Quoting Ken Restivo <ken@email-addr-hidden>:
>
> > And here is the next installment in the saga of trying to get Ingo
> > RT going on my Asus EEE.
> >
> > I successfully built and ran the 2.6.26.8-rt12 with the alsa_seq
> > patch. It ran.
> >
> > The problem is that neither the Ethernet (atl1e) or wireless
> > (rt2860sta) work. So I pretty much had to reboot back out of it
> > immediately.
>
> I've been running the standard kernel from openSUSE 11.0 on my Athlon
> 2000+ and can get down to at least 5.3ms latency on an Audiophile 2496
> using the limits.conf "trick".
>
> Do people really need lower latencies for music purposes or are we
> just thinking "well, I needed the RT patch three years ago; I ain't
> stopping now" ?
>
> - Peder
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 27 16:15:06 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 27 2009 - 16:15:07 EET