On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 06:11:37PM +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
> > My needs are professional, ergo I do not need or want Pulseaudio.
>
> I just can't see this as an issue, cause it's not;). Pulse runs as a
> JACK client. End of story;).
I'll decide for myself if something is an issue or not,
and I don't need any big brother to do that in my place.
- I don't want desktop sounds.
- I only use audio apps that talk to jack and
then only those that behave.
- I don't need PulseAudio, and don't want it,
not even as a jack client. It's useless for
me and someday it's going to do something
I don't like.
So where do you get the idea that PulseAudio
should be forced down everybody's throat ?
If I don't need and want a TV, not even a free
one, are you going to say me I must have one
at home because most people want one ?
Any good reason why PulseAudio is not installed
as a service that can be enabled/disabled as
seen fit by the user, just as almost all system
components ?
Ciao,
-- FA Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sat May 16 20:15:04 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 16 2009 - 20:15:05 EEST