Re: [LAU] need some advice before upgrading JACK

From: Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Sep 18 2009 - 18:33:20 EEST

Ray Rashif wrote:
>
> JACK1 is definitely more reliable than JACK2, as some plug-ins
> (notably VST ones) may fail to launch/run properly. But this is
> negligible, and not a factor at all if your system is native.
>
Good to know. The production box stays native, but I'll stick with JACK1
for now.

> JACK has nothing to do with "apps" code-wise unless there is a
> specific compile-time config which the app needs, so there is no need
> to recompile anything of that sort (Ardour, Qtractor). What usually
> requires recompilation are libraries, but so far I don't know of any
> such inter-related lib. For eg. you can have an older ffado and still
> run jack with firewire.

Okay, thanks, that's what I was really concerned about.

Best,

dp

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 18 20:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 18 2009 - 20:15:02 EEST