Re: [LAU] need some advice before upgrading JACK

From: Ray Rashif <schivmeister@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Sep 18 2009 - 18:44:46 EEST

2009/9/18 Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden>

> Ray Rashif wrote:
> >
> > JACK1 is definitely more reliable than JACK2, as some plug-ins
> > (notably VST ones) may fail to launch/run properly. But this is
> > negligible, and not a factor at all if your system is native.
> >
> Good to know. The production box stays native, but I'll stick with JACK1
> for now.
>
>
In case I was vague, I didn't imply that it should be avoided! JACK2 is
simply great with regards to performance ;)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 18 20:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Sep 18 2009 - 20:15:02 EEST