Re: [LAU] CENSORING public archives (Was: Problem post)

From: david <gnome@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Feb 02 2010 - 20:45:58 EET

The censorship should have been performed by the original poster.

Also, legally, simply deleting the post wouldn't be sufficient, since
you don't know how many list members still have a copy of the original
email.

Deleting the post could ALSO be considered an effort to destroy evidence
and hide something illegal.

Luke Peterson wrote:
> Wow, this seems like a fantastic idea if your goal is to scare the crap
> out of the commercial manufacturing side of the digital audio world,
> cause hesitation in further participation in the linux/open source
> community, and get an individual contributor to the community fired from
> his job/sued.
>
> Muse makes interesting, helpful products, has a lot of valuable IP
> invested in computer audio production, and as a result of this exchange
> very likely are about to institute a corporate policy dictating their
> employees never contribute any of that knowledge to public forums such
> as this.
>
> Nice work.
>
> -----
> Luke Peterson
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 7:29 AM, Marc-Olivier Barre
> <marco@email-addr-hidden <mailto:marco@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:31:33 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico@email-addr-hidden
> <mailto:ico@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
> > Marc, this is a top priority matter. Could you please look into t
> before
> > te end of the day?
> >
> > Many thanks!
> >
> > Ico
> >
> > Michael Ost <most@email-addr-hidden
> <mailto:most@email-addr-hidden>> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Marc,
> >>
> >>Can you help me delete a post please? We are under threat of a
> lawsuit
> >>because of it, so I'm eager to get this resolved. Help?
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>Michael Ost
> >>
> >>Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> >>> Michael,
> >>>
> >>> I am forwarding this to Marc who is in charge of mailing lists.
> >>>
> >>> Hope this helps!
> >>>
> >>> Marc, please see below.
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes,
> >>>
> >>> Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
> >>> Composition, Music Technology
> >>> Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio
> >>> Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra
> >>> Assistant Co-Director, CCTAD
> >>> CHCI, CS, and Art (by courtesy)
> >>> Virginia Tech
> >>> Dept. of Music - 0240
> >>> Blacksburg, VA 24061
> >>> (540) 231-6139
> >>> (540) 231-5034 (fax)
> >>> ico@email-addr-hidden <mailto:ico@email-addr-hidden>
> >>> http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/bukvic/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Michael Ost [mailto:most@email-addr-hidden
> <mailto:most@email-addr-hidden>]
> >>>> Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 1:20 PM
> >>>> To: Ivica Ico Bukvic
> >>>> Cc: Chris Halaby
> >>>> Subject: Problem post
> >>>>
> >>>> Ivica,
> >>>>
> >>>> I made a post to linux-audio-user in January 2007
> ([linux-audio-user]
> >>>> iLok protection on Linux Wed Jan 10 15:22:48 EST 2007) that
> violates
> an
> >>>> NDA that my company has with the copy protection company, Pace AP.
> >>>>
> >>>> Would you be able to delete the post for me? I found
> instructions for
> >>>> how to do it with the mailman mailing list program here:
> >>>> http://wiki.list.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=4030681
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for your attention,
> >>>>
> >>>> Michael Ost
> >>>
> >>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Given the nature of this discussion, I am CCing the linux-audio-user
> mailing list since this is about deleting legitimate content from the
> archives because of a company that produces some of those shitty
> software
> locks. I'm not gonna go easy on this.
>
> First of all, let me remind you, and every linux-audio-user member out
> there that the archives *ARE PUBLIC*, and thus what you post here
> will be
> eventually readable by the *WHOLE WORLD*.
>
> Read this again: the archives *ARE PUBLIC*, and thus what you post here
> will be eventually readable by the *WHOLE WORLD*
> Once more just to make sure: the archives *ARE PUBLIC*, and thus
> what you
> post here will be eventually readable by the *WHOLE WORLD*
>
> Deleting the post is not going to happen, I am only willing to
> censor the
> one post that poses an issue provided the name of the company is
> mentioned
> on a censor banner inside the post. The least we can do with such a
> case is
> add a little public humiliation to this.
>
> Also I would like to say that this is the one and only time that this
> happens. Next time, the original poster will face the legal
> consequences. I
> hope this is crystal clear to every one reading.
>
> Just to make sure we are talking about the right post, is it this one ?
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2007-January/041742.html
>
> I will not even read a reply that does not include the linux-audio-user
> list in CC.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Marc-Olivier Barre
> XMPP ID : marco@email-addr-hidden <mailto:marco@email-addr-hidden>
> www.MarcOChapeau.org <http://www.MarcOChapeau.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> <mailto:Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden>
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 3 00:15:02 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 03 2010 - 00:15:04 EET